The descriptions you gave of each actual INT were: “I’ll-advised”, “Not open at all”, “should have been thrown into the
ground”
“Just not open at all”
“Double coverage”
100% about decision making and nothing about accuracy until you got to the non-INT free play.
But if you insist that “the point of [your] OP is that he’s not accurate”…I guess I’ll have to take your word for it… but your examples and descriptions apart from the free play didn’t make it seem like the point.
There’s a reason so many people didn’t think that play fit with the rest of your post, and it might not be that we are all stupid.