Jan 4, 2025
8:00:20pm
8:00:20pm
Predicting performance and rankings should be different IMO. I get the use of it
but for rankings, particularly head to head, that should matter more than who would win more if played 100x. I can see that for beginning of year, but not for end. Any ranking that has Colorado above BYU at end of season is flawed.
- Bio page
- sah22
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Last login
- Jan 6, 2025
- Total posts
- 5,926 (6 FO)
Messages
Time
Jan 3, 10:30am
Jan 3, 11:23am
Jan 3, 10:00am
Jan 3, 10:01am
Jan 3, 10:06am
Jan 3, 10:12am
Jan 3, 10:17am
Ratings after 13-14 games this late into the season are based off a lot more than the outcome of a single game
Jan 3, 10:20am
Jan 3, 10:29am
Jan 3, 10:51am
Jan 3, 11:30am
Jan 3, 6:12pm
I’m too dumb to understand everything, but is he suggesting that espn arbitrarily is keeping big XII teams lower?
Jan 3, 10:02am
Jan 3, 11:13am
Jan 3, 4:50pm
Jan 3, 10:10am
Jan 3, 10:54am
Jan 3, 10:19am
Jan 3, 11:13am
Jan 3, 10:29am
Jan 3, 12:26pm
Jan 3, 12:32pm
Jan 3, 12:50pm
OK you go bet money against Vegas with your "fair" model and someone else can use the FPI (52.8% against the spread)
Jan 3, 12:56pm
Jan 3, 2:28pm
Jan 3, 4:18pm
Jan 3, 3:19pm
Jan 3, 3:35pm
Jan 3, 12:34pm
That’s most of it. People want to blame recruiting rankings, or past results, and all types of other stuff
Jan 3, 1:12pm
Jan 3, 2:16pm
Jan 3, 5:59pm
If you can most accurately predict who wins games and by what score, then why would that not also be telling you who the
Jan 3, 7:04pm
Jan 3, 7:56pm
Jan 3, 7:25pm
Jan 4, 4:25pm
Jan 4, 8:41pm