Feb 9, 2023
1:13:43pm
1:13:43pm
But those partial-share agreements only last a few years, so who cares?
It's like duh, every conference does that, what people want to understand is where the payouts ultimately land for the long term.
Taking the long view, it's hard to see SDSU and SMU adding much value.
Taking the long view, it's hard to see SDSU and SMU adding much value.
- Previous username
- ArchbishopMitty
- Bio page
- Mitty
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
- Last login
- Jun 29, 2024
- Total posts
- 13,303 (4 FO)
Messages
Time
2/9/23 10:58am
2/9/23 11:49am
2/9/23 10:59am
2/9/23 11:10am
The article basically confirms the PAC expansion strategy is to invite teams, give them a small share of revenue,
2/9/23 11:07am
2/9/23 11:12am
2/9/23 11:43am
2/9/23 12:46pm
2/9/23 12:21pm
2/9/23 2:33pm
I agree. However, it's not a doomsday scenario if the price tag is $30 million +. Big 12 guys have been claiming
2/9/23 2:05pm
It absolutely is. Amazon knows it is overpaying and everyone else knows the PAC will not attract any eyeballs.
2/9/23 2:23pm
Nah...missing the CFP is 100% due to parity when the top teams were upset. Oregon, USC and Utah have all bumped
2/9/23 2:41pm
Everyone wants to see USC return to greatness, that had little to nothing to do with Utah. Sorry, as great as your
2/9/23 3:27pm
Weird...because I bet most those watching weren't USC or Utah fans rather those who wanted to see Utah win
2/9/23 6:05pm
2/10/23 7:17am
2/9/23 2:11pm
2/9/23 2:19pm
2/9/23 3:25pm
2/10/23 9:59am