Dec 31, 2024
9:34:20am
9:34:20am
If you like the current setup, imagine a scenario where BYU played Colorado with
the same result (36-14) early in the season as a “non-conference” game, as several of the Big12 teams did this year. Then imagine that the same tie-breaking procedures were applied. We would have still been left out of the championship game.
The tiebreaker that I’m suggesting should be replaced is pretty far down the list of tiebreakers. I think your concern about prioritizing performance in conference is already adequately addressed by all the sorting that precedes it (conference record, H2H, common opponents, etc.). No? You want to split hairs on opponents’ in-conference record?
The tiebreaker that I’m suggesting should be replaced is pretty far down the list of tiebreakers. I think your concern about prioritizing performance in conference is already adequately addressed by all the sorting that precedes it (conference record, H2H, common opponents, etc.). No? You want to split hairs on opponents’ in-conference record?
- Bio page
- royal_blue
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2006
- Last login
- Jan 4, 2025
- Total posts
- 3,033 (5 FO)
Messages
Time
12/31/24 8:09am
I could see going SOR overall but just non conf makes no sense in determining a conf title. Maybe by CFP rank?
12/31/24 8:12am
12/31/24 8:15am
12/31/24 8:43am
12/31/24 9:02am
12/31/24 9:34am