asked for data. That's the way to prove your point. Just show us any data to support your valuation for today. It's so easy. Just give us your data to support your valuation.

And - for the readers here who aren't well versed on the hit piece that OrsoNero has quoted... and his support for his claim about today's valuation.... he ignores this comment from the same article.

"But not all of Musk’s investors are upset. Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who has invested the most in X after Musk himself, with nearly $2 billion rolled into the company, told the Post that he’s still very happy with his investment and felt that there was “no devaluation whatsoever.”"

So the guy (Gerber) who has a personal vendetta against Musk and has an investment of less than a million in X is somehow supposed to be believed over bin Talal who has invested billions? Why do you ignore bin Talal's claims and support Gerber's claims? What justification do you have to support one over the other?

Just supply the data you use to come to your valuation conclusions. We'll then use those same data points to come to our own conclusions.