Sorry. You’re right. Highest ranked teams is what I should have posted above. I’d go 1) head to head, 2) common

Report problem with this ad

Dec 31, 2024
9:17:03am

byuTX mutual friends

opponents among tied teams, then maybe CFP ranking over conf opponent winning percentage.

Just an idea though.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Dec 31, 2024 at 9:17:03am

Message modified by byuTX on Dec 31, 2024 at 9:18:35am

Report problem with this ad

byuTX

Previous username: TEXAS
Bio page: byuTX
Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Last login: Jan 5, 2025
Total posts: 76,766 (41,874 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

A better conference tiebreaker would have been a metric for non-conference SOR.

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:09am

I could see going SOR overall but just non conf makes no sense in determining a conf title. Maybe by CFP rank?

byuTX

12/31/24 8:12am

It’s assuming all of the same tiebreakers that precede the current in-conference

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:15am

If conference wants to ensure their *top ranked two teams (like BYU and ASU this year) should have gone by CFP ranking

byuTX

12/31/24 8:18am

Has to be CFP ranking. Best chance at getting at least two in every time.

Coop

12/31/24 8:21am

CFP ranking is subjective. You really trust them to pick the best teams? They

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:25am

BYU was ranked lower than ISU by the committee, presumably because of the Big12s

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:24am

You want the committee dominated by P2 interests to have a say in the B12 champ?

d-coug

12/31/24 8:29am

How is this getting 👍s? ISU was ranked over BYU. Anyway, why would you want to

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:57am

The committee is also in charge of putting teams in the CFP. That’s their main task. Best way to get our two highest

byuTX

12/31/24 9:11am

But you understand the thing that you said was wrong? You said the best two

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:15am

Sorry. You’re right. Highest ranked teams is what I should have posted above. I’d go 1) head to head, 2) common

byuTX

12/31/24 9:17am

Why not let the schools choose?

Lvworkman

12/31/24 8:43am

That invites potential for corruption. Votes can be bought.

royal_blue

12/31/24 8:47am

If you want the best team you need to do overall SOR, not non-conf SOR

BYUCLA

12/31/24 8:55am

That is already handled by the preceding tiebreakers.

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:00am

You are proposing replacing conf SOR with non-conf SOR, no?

BYUCLA

12/31/24 9:02am

1.) The current tiebreaker is not conference SOR. It’s the record of opponents

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:12am

When all teams have the same record, SOS is the same as SOR.

BYUCLA

12/31/24 9:18am

I agree that it’s close even if it’s not exactly the same, so we can move on

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:51am

I like it as it is. Conference games should determine winners

Belboz

12/31/24 9:20am

If you like the current setup, imagine a scenario where BYU played Colorado with

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:34am

Hoping a team you scheduled 14 years ago is good enough to help your SOS so you can make the CCG is silly. Current tie

byuTX

12/31/24 9:40am

I think your suggestion that the CFP ranking should be used invalidates all

royal_blue

12/31/24 9:59am

Haha. Maybe the tiebreaker should be the conference picks two best teams equipped to win a playoff game. Which is what

byuTX

12/31/24 12:04pm

The way I feel about it has nothing to do with BYU. It makes sense as it is.

Belboz

12/31/24 1:20pm

Insert whatever team you want in place of BYU. It’s a hypothetical scenario.

Posting on CougarBoard