My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 2, 2025
11:11
:52
am
cwilke1
Truly Addicted User
yes I agree that natural tackling includes lowering the head as part of lowering
the entire body.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
cwilke1
Bio page
cwilke1
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Last login
Jan 6, 2025
Total posts
13,551 (8 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
If that hit in the Texas-Arizona State game was not targeting, what is?
BYUFootballRocks1
All-American
Jan 2, 8:19am
It has to be forcible contact. Not "any contact".
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 8:26am
Everybody knows knocking a guy nearly unconscious isn't forcible contact
Goliath
Jan 2, 8:27am
So the player running into the contact isn’t “forcible”?
Yukon
Jan 2, 8:28am
Every tackle has forcible contact. In order for it to be a foul it has to be forcible contact
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 8:31am
Maybe I am not remembering correctly but I recall
BYU Fan
Jan 2, 8:53am
you just argued against your own point
Count Cougar
Jan 2, 9:53am
No, I didn't. The rules specify where forcible contact is and isn't allowed on a defenseless player
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 9:55am
He lowered his helmet and smacked the ASU guy in the head knocking him senseless
BYU Fan
Jan 2, 10:02am
He didn't lower his helmet.
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 10:09am
I disagree
BYU Fan
Jan 2, 11:06am
yes I agree that natural tackling includes lowering the head as part of lowering
cwilke1
Jan 2, 11:11am
The NCAA rulebook defines lowering the helmet as making contact with the crown of the helmet,
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 11:11am
if was your son, you would say it was targeting
Count Cougar
Jan 2, 10:03am
I think there is a good chance it was targeting.
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 10:12am
If after a nights sleep Skep. O. still has this take, it’s not worth debating it
Crowd Factor
Jan 2, 8:31am
Ok, then don't debate it.
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 8:33am
He's head snapping back isn't "forcible"?
byubyu
Jan 2, 8:29am
It WAS forcible contact, he sprinted for 10 yards and slammed into the receiver...
BYUFootballRocks1
Jan 2, 8:30am
Did the defender “lead” with the helmet to create the forcible contact though.
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:32am
well the 4th possible indicator is "initiating forcible contact with the crown
cwilke1
Jan 2, 8:37am
The “lead” part is what I was focusing on though. He’s making a form tackle
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:43am
its plausible to interpret it the way you are, but our body of actual referee
cwilke1
Jan 2, 8:48am
I’ve seen plays that I thought were worse go uncalled plenty, where it seemed
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:51am
It certainly would be interesting to see a video montage of plays called
cwilke1
Jan 2, 9:08am
I’ve seen so many that were players crouching, thrusting, leading with their
cougaman
Jan 2, 9:18am
espn scott helton and their rules expert afterwards on sportscenter said they
cwilke1
Jan 2, 9:24am
"lead" with the helmet? He met him face-to-face with his helmet -
BYUFootballRocks1
Jan 2, 8:41am
That’s not close to what I said and you clearly don’t want to try to understand
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:45am
Head to head was the first contact.
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 8:46am
He’s trying to wrap him up and use his arms to make the tackle though, his head
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:50am
You're being irrational in your defense of a horrible non-call.
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 8:51am
No, I’m not. Because I disagree with you doesn’t make me irrational.
cougaman
Jan 2, 9:36am
No, it doesn't. It's because you're not reasonably interpreting the rule or
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 12:47pm
And you must be the authority on what’s reasonable. Maybe we call all be as
cougaman
Jan 2, 1:45pm
Now you're being reasonable.
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 2:03pm
the first contact was head to head and it was with the crown.
FieroCoug
Jan 2, 1:49pm
Not by the ncaas definition of the crown
cougaman
Jan 2, 3:01pm
Not even close
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 3:17pm
6 inch circle from the top of the head right? if that’s what it is it
FieroCoug
Jan 2, 3:42pm
Sprinting 10 yards and slamming into the receiver isn't a foul - that happens on just about every
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 8:37am
baloney-he hit him in the head! wondering if just you're trying to be contrary -
BYUFootballRocks1
Jan 2, 8:42am
I'm not trying to be contrary. I'm not even arguing that it was the correct call.
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 9:58am
he slams him in the face with his helmet at top speed and it's not targeting? got it...
BYUFootballRocks1
Jan 2, 8:44am
playing word games is not the proper answer
Count Cougar
Jan 2, 8:31am
The verbatim text of the rule isn't a word game. The OP was wrong when he said that any contact
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 2, 8:35am
It knocked him completely off his feet.
SoCalCoug
Jan 2, 8:45am
When the refs pick up a flag like that after review
Goliath
Jan 2, 8:29am
I don’t think they threw a flag
cougaman
Jan 2, 8:32am
I don’t think they threw a flag
Beggar
Jan 2, 8:33am
Not only did they NOT throw a flag, the review was initiated by the “booth”
Endocoug
Jan 2, 8:41am
The refs didn't say "no targeting". They simply didn't throw a flag.
Goliath
Jan 2, 1:04pm
Im no expert but it seems like they’ve changed
I'mBatman
Jan 2, 8:41am
I didn't think it was targeting because the crown of the helmet wasn't used
Coug
Jan 2, 8:45am
"crown of the helmet" isn't a thing on a defenseless player.
Ghost of Peanut
Jan 2, 9:00am
It is one of the four “things”
Endocoug
Jan 2, 9:03am
None of the four indicators are required for defenseless players.
BYUCLA
Jan 2, 9:27am
That's not true. Read the rule. It specifically says an indicator is required.
Radioactive Coug
Jan 2, 9:32am
I edited my post right after I posted and realized I was wrong but must not have
BYUCLA
Jan 2, 9:59am
someone posted the rule yesterday and rule said that there still has to be 1
cwilke1
Jan 2, 9:33am
Great points. Watching the game and play live, it was clearly targeting by the
Mitty
Jan 2, 10:32am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
