Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up
Jan 2, 2025
9:58:42am
Skeptical Optimist Truly Addicted User
I'm not trying to be contrary. I'm not even arguing that it was the correct call.
I'm saying that there is some justification for the no call if the refs determined that the forcible contact was to a legal part of the body (I.E. the chest or shoulder pads) instead of the head or neck area, and that the contact with the head was incidental and not forcible.

I'm mainly arguing against the silly idea that the Big 10 refs colluded and cheated to prop up an SEC team in the CFP. That's a dumb argument.
Skeptical Optimist
Previous username
workindev
Bio page
Skeptical Optimist
Joined
Aug 2, 2006
Last login
Jan 6, 2025
Total posts
85,402 (4,534 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.