Apr 17, 2016
10:20:13pm
10:20:13pm
It was an opposition brief from the Defendant (MLB). The case settled.
It was a declaratory action so they people sued MLB requesting that the court say that they weren't infringing on by selling their napkin box covers.
And then MLB paid the filing fee and said they'd leave this group alone and the people dropped the action.
Regardless, I didn't see ds7's original link and it has literally nothing to due players likeness issue, as you said above.
And then MLB paid the filing fee and said they'd leave this group alone and the people dropped the action.
Regardless, I didn't see ds7's original link and it has literally nothing to due players likeness issue, as you said above.
Originally posted on Apr 17, 2016 at 10:20:13pm
Message modified by shimmy on Apr 17, 2016 at 10:21:51pm
- Previous username
- AFCoug83
- Bio page
- shimmy
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2008
- Last login
- Nov 17, 2024
- Total posts
- 122,101 (37,874 FO)
