Mar 31, 2025
8:34:28am
reddead All-American
I think the idea is that investments "should" be big enough that growth is used
but the principal stays more or less untouched throughout retirement.

Whether or not that holds true remains to be seen; I'm sure a lot of people are planning on dipping into their investments for personal reasons ("You can't take it with you") or necessity (nest egg never got big enough to become a perpetual motion machine).

I also expect that ballooning medical costs at the end of life will wipe a lot of wealth and potential inheritances off the map, and that much of what is inherited will be promptly liquidated by younger generations to pay off debt/enjoy the windfall, etc.

I guess that's a long way of saying that I think you're generally right, but that I expect it will take longer than we think for these assets to be liquidated, which means that the time horizon for growth might be 30-40 yrs instead of 15-20.
reddead
Bio page
reddead
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Last login
Apr 2, 2025
Total posts
6,567 (9 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.