My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 12, 2024
12:56
:07
pm
EM_Puma
Truly Addicted User
Direct from my Big XII ref friend, "They would have scored and won the game.
The penalty is basically ignored with no time on the clock."
So yes, it was very important that we stopped the play, or in this case, got our 3rd turnover of the game.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
EM_Puma
Previous username
AF_Puma
Bio page
EM_Puma
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Last login
Nov 13, 2024
Total posts
4,156 (1 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
The penalty on Harlan would not have negated a touchdown on the last play.
BlueMatter
Starter
Nov 12, 12:38pm
What if they made contact with a player?
Stucoug83
Nov 12, 12:40pm
If they interfere with the play its a different live-ball penalty.
CougPrime
Nov 12, 12:44pm
That’s where the interpretation is wrong. He was participating in the play at
bluecougar1985
Nov 12, 12:44pm
It's crazy the refs clearly favored Utah on that play by not immediately blowing the play dead, giving them an unfair
durandal
Nov 12, 12:41pm
I don't believe you are correct. This was not the case of being just barely on the field, but he was
kimdaddy35
Nov 12, 12:43pm
If it interferes with the play it would have been a different penalty
BlueMatter
Nov 12, 12:49pm
Again being on the field interferes with the play in my opinion. I think that is the way they would
kimdaddy35
Nov 12, 12:50pm
I disagree that being on the field automatically is interfering with the play.
BlueMatter
Nov 12, 1:47pm
You are welcome to disagree. I think there is about a 0% chance they wouldn't have called that
kimdaddy35
Nov 12, 1:51pm
I had wondered when cb wanted that to happen if that would have been bad
BYU '80
Nov 12, 12:45pm
Direct from my Big XII ref friend, "They would have scored and won the game.
EM_Puma
Nov 12, 12:56pm
What does your friend think of the hold call?
durandal
Nov 12, 12:58pm
I'm not going to ask him on that. At least not to post on social media.
EM_Puma
Nov 12, 1:01pm
And, even if the AD interfered with contact with a player, it would be the same
EM_Puma
Nov 12, 1:15pm
That is not correct, as it is in the rule book that refs have the
Ghost of Peanut
Nov 12, 1:21pm
Interesting. I don't know. I asked that specific question and that was the
EM_Puma
Nov 12, 1:25pm
Sorry, missed your question. Yes, the refs can even award a TD if they determine
Ghost of Peanut
Nov 12, 1:23pm
That doesn't make any sense. What if he blocks a defender in that instance?
Mitty
Nov 12, 1:32pm
He was in front of the play, not behind it. There's no way that universally
Mitty
Nov 12, 1:34pm
You are describing a very different situation. In your hypothetical the refs have their discretion to award a touchdown.
BlueMatter
Nov 12, 1:38pm
I see, you are saying the specific penalty cited would not have negated a TD
Mitty
Nov 12, 1:55pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad