while at best only being able to declare that "it looks like". Not sure why pointing out that you keep using very contradictory language is upsetting to you.

"It looks like" is very far from definitive style language. If you believe that still frame is definitive proof that the ball hit the ground without being secured, then just say that.


Every time you say "it looks like", and you keep repeating that all over this thread, it means you haven't presented irrefutable evidence to declare it was a bad call.


You've already admitted it looked like an int in real time. Video evidence does not provide definitive, irrefutable proof to the contrary. What more is there really to say?