I care because we have will ferrin. It’s automatic 1 yet for the sake of math we

Dec 30, 2024
6:37:48pm

chitownboy Starter

Go for 2. Doesn’t make sense to me. But if going for 2 is the right thing we should just do it most every time instead of for math

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Dec 30, 2024 at 6:37:48pm

Message modified by chitownboy on Dec 30, 2024 at 6:39:12pm

Report problem with this ad

chitownboy

Bio page: chitownboy
Joined: Aug 6, 2010
Last login: Jan 4, 2025
Total posts: 1,201 (1 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

So - lingering question - why go for the 2 pt conversion up 33 to 7?

Eddie

12/30/24 4:24pm

35-7. 4 even TDs. He didn’t know if Colorado was going to go off. 🤷‍♂️

BYUforlife

12/30/24 4:26pm

Even still, quite early to be doing that sort of thing in my book.

Bob Vance

12/30/24 4:39pm

Kalani has seen the Miracle bowl highlights

ABCoug

12/30/24 5:16pm

Because it would put us at a tie with if they scored 4 touchdowns w/ xtra points

King of Y

12/30/24 4:27pm

It makes it a four touchdown game 28 point differential. It was logical.

Archaea

12/30/24 4:27pm

With that amount of time left and having will ferrin. No it’s not logical

chitownboy

12/30/24 4:29pm

It's not illogical either. Perhaps we had a play that we thought we could convert 80% of the time? If so, then I'm ok

HarlemCoug

12/30/24 4:33pm

They didn't convert but I thought it was the smart play.

Archaea

12/30/24 4:33pm

Well seeing 2pt conversions are less than 45% converted. I’m sure every team

chitownboy

12/30/24 4:40pm

It's just pure math. Being up 26 or 27 is pretty much the same, but up 28 means

Ghost of Peanut

12/30/24 5:29pm

That was my assumption, to be honest.

Eddie

12/30/24 5:56pm

There was 10 min left in the game. The way the defense was playing there was no

chitownboy

12/30/24 6:15pm

Feels like BYU fans should never need reminding about a

Ghost of Peanut

12/30/24 6:29pm

I care because we have will ferrin. It’s automatic 1 yet for the sake of math we

chitownboy

12/30/24 6:37pm

Going for it to put you up 4 even touchdowns seems a little insecure in your defense, which doesn’t make sense

KYU

12/30/24 4:28pm

Colorado has been explosive on offense all year. They can score quickly.

BYUtka

12/30/24 4:29pm

28 points (4 TD's to tie) vs 27 (4 TD's to win). Also Colorado can score quickly

BYUtka

12/30/24 4:28pm

Math checks out

Saregreat

12/30/24 4:41pm

His math is correct. Your ability to follow his logic is not.

King of Y

12/30/24 6:40pm

I was agreeing with him...

Saregreat

12/30/24 9:11pm

They weren’t going to totally count the INT. They took it in a soft count

Q-grr

12/30/24 4:31pm

To remove all doubt that we can’t convert 2 pointer.

Bluforever

12/30/24 4:34pm

I think they wanted to practice red zone throws in low stakes

seco03

12/30/24 4:38pm

Yes.

Brisco

12/30/24 6:05pm

For everyone who said it was to go up by 4 TD's even - that is what I assumed.

Eddie

12/30/24 4:42pm

the reality is that there is no strong evidence either way on what the best move would be.

HarlemCoug

12/30/24 4:48pm

It made sense and was not running up the score at that point. It made sense to

Tuskaloosa Cougar

12/30/24 4:43pm

Making or missing that attempt wasn't going to seal the game. The game was done.

Eddie

12/30/24 4:45pm

Actually, there is more risk of missing the 2 pt conversion than 1 point. Which one is really running up the score?

Posting on CougarBoard