I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 15, 2024
9:11:34am

Belboz Truly Addicted User

I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.

Report problem with this ad

Belboz

Bio page: Belboz
Joined: Jul 5, 2001
Last login: Oct 15, 2024
Total posts: 76,778 (13,734 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

It’s 34-19 and Arizona goes for 2. Why did they go for 2 in that situation. What

BYU-Ite

8:20am

If they could have scored 2 TDs + 2 x 2 point conversions the score would have

Hinta

8:21am

I don’t get it either, I guess, trying to set up the win….

JOPE

8:22am

Because you can go for it a second time if you don’t get it the first and tie

puntersarepeople

8:25am

I think they were hoping they could get the 2pt, get another touchdown

Ungoy

8:22am

I also thought that going for a FG when down by 3 scores with 9 minutes left was an odd choice

Skeptical Optimist

8:23am

They were down 3 scores at that point, 17 pts. FG cuts it to 14 - two scores

Captain Stubing

8:31am

It was the right call, it got them within 2 scores, but settling for the FG

Corn Pop

8:32am

Optics. 21 looks better than 19.

BlueFever

8:26am

It’s about going for the win rather than going for the tie and hoping for OT

TCuz

8:27am

This, it's a math coaching thing. When down by multiple scores late in the game,

thecave

8:35am

going for the win.

Belboz

8:33am

Better question, why call all the time outs when BYU was trying to end the game?

Benfica1

8:34am

I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.

Belboz

9:11am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad