My Account
Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 15, 2024
8:20
:22
am
BYU-Ite
All-American
It’s 34-19 and Arizona goes for 2. Why did they go for 2 in that situation. What
am I missing?
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
BYU-Ite
Bio page
BYU-Ite
Joined
Jan 9, 2002
Last login
Oct 15, 2024
Total posts
8,484 (19 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
It’s 34-19 and Arizona goes for 2. Why did they go for 2 in that situation. What
BYU-Ite
8:20am
If they could have scored 2 TDs + 2 x 2 point conversions the score would have
Hinta
8:21am
I don’t get it either, I guess, trying to set up the win….
JOPE
8:22am
Because you can go for it a second time if you don’t get it the first and tie
puntersarepeople
8:25am
I think they were hoping they could get the 2pt, get another touchdown
Ungoy
8:22am
I also thought that going for a FG when down by 3 scores with 9 minutes left was an odd choice
Skeptical Optimist
8:23am
They were down 3 scores at that point, 17 pts. FG cuts it to 14 - two scores
Captain Stubing
8:31am
It was the right call, it got them within 2 scores, but settling for the FG
Corn Pop
8:32am
Optics. 21 looks better than 19.
BlueFever
8:26am
It’s about going for the win rather than going for the tie and hoping for OT
TCuz
8:27am
This, it's a math coaching thing. When down by multiple scores late in the game,
thecave
8:35am
going for the win.
Belboz
8:33am
Better question, why call all the time outs when BYU was trying to end the game?
Benfica1
8:34am
I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.
Belboz
9:11am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
