My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 15, 2024
8:25
:48
am
puntersarepeople
Truly Addicted User
Because you can go for it a second time if you don’t get it the first and tie
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
puntersarepeople
Bio page
puntersarepeople
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Last login
Oct 15, 2024
Total posts
35,567 (15 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
It’s 34-19 and Arizona goes for 2. Why did they go for 2 in that situation. What
BYU-Ite
8:20am
If they could have scored 2 TDs + 2 x 2 point conversions the score would have
Hinta
8:21am
I don’t get it either, I guess, trying to set up the win….
JOPE
8:22am
Because you can go for it a second time if you don’t get it the first and tie
puntersarepeople
8:25am
I think they were hoping they could get the 2pt, get another touchdown
Ungoy
8:22am
I also thought that going for a FG when down by 3 scores with 9 minutes left was an odd choice
Skeptical Optimist
8:23am
They were down 3 scores at that point, 17 pts. FG cuts it to 14 - two scores
Captain Stubing
8:31am
It was the right call, it got them within 2 scores, but settling for the FG
Corn Pop
8:32am
Optics. 21 looks better than 19.
BlueFever
8:26am
It’s about going for the win rather than going for the tie and hoping for OT
TCuz
8:27am
This, it's a math coaching thing. When down by multiple scores late in the game,
thecave
8:35am
going for the win.
Belboz
8:33am
Better question, why call all the time outs when BYU was trying to end the game?
Benfica1
8:34am
I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.
Belboz
9:11am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
