My Account
Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 1, 2025
7:35
:02
pm
garyfan
Truly Addicted User
They would have had 1st down in Texas territory. Possible TD.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
garyfan
Bio page
garyfan
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Last login
Jan 8, 2025
Total posts
40,535 (4,184 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Targeting no-call against Texas: there is an argument that it wasn’t targeting
Skeptical Optimist
Truly Addicted User
Jan 1, 6:56pm
There's a better argument. SEC home cooking.
hebercreeper
Jan 1, 6:59pm
Arizona State got plenty of close and questionable calls
Coop
Jan 1, 7:02pm
It wasn’t an SEC officiating crew
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:17pm
Big Ten and SEC are tighter now than a senior prom queen and her dress.
byujacob
Jan 1, 7:29pm
Don’t agree with what you’re saying at all. This is clear contact to the head on a defenseless player which is targeting
yapacoug
Jan 1, 7:00pm
It’s isn’t clear where the forcible contact was made
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:09pm
Yep. In the speeds on this video, the helmet to helmet contact was the first
Crowd Factor
Jan 1, 7:36pm
I don’t think face mask to face mask contact should be targeting
Coop
Jan 1, 7:01pm
"Minimal contact." That's funny.
Spiff
Jan 1, 7:03pm
He posts a video and claims the opposite of what happened
Plato
Jan 1, 7:23pm
Sure looks forcible to me.
bluesloth
Jan 1, 7:06pm
Forcible contact to the shoulder pad is legal
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:11pm
This is a hit to the head:
bluesloth
Jan 1, 7:15pm
Yeah. No shoulder pad there. Helmet to helmet. Defenseless player. Review booth missed the call
TADOW
Jan 1, 7:17pm
That video doesn’t show where the forcible contact was made, you can’t see the front of his
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:21pm
What? That is absolutely forcible contact to the head. Not sure what definition
bluesloth
Jan 1, 7:25pm
The NCAA defines it as “going beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball”
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:35pm
The two angles you showed were absolutely clear that d hit with facemask first
cwilke1
Jan 1, 7:40pm
You need X-ray vision to see through the Texas defenders shoulder to see where contact was first made
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:52pm
You just need to look at the screen of the two different angles shown to easily
cwilke1
Jan 1, 7:54pm
What are you watching or looking at? No way you are able to make your
Crowd Factor
Jan 1, 7:39pm
I definitely don't want that to be targeting.
JuicyJam
Jan 1, 7:07pm
Looks like forcible head to head to contact to me.
TailgateU
Jan 1, 7:08pm
I know this isn’t a factor for targeting, but the fact that the ball was tipped
garyfan
Jan 1, 7:10pm
All I know is I’ve seen a lot less egregious hits be called than that.
The Pope
Jan 1, 7:22pm
It is such a wildly, inconsistently called penalty. As soon as it happened as I said to myself:
TheLoneCougar
Jan 1, 7:24pm
That’s the problem here. Plays like that do get called all the time
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:38pm
Wouldn't have mattered anyway. Their kicker would've missed the FG.
ShinobiCoug
Jan 1, 7:25pm
They would have had 1st down in Texas territory. Possible TD.
garyfan
Jan 1, 7:35pm
It's possible but I suspect they wouldn't have scored in remaining 50 seconds
cwilke1
Jan 1, 7:38pm
Wow, I suppose that since a few downs weren't productive we should just ignore
TailgateU
Jan 1, 10:59pm
that's not what I said. I am arguing in favor that the refs should have called
cwilke1
Jan 1, 11:05pm
There may be credible argument but you're not making it
Remigius
Jan 1, 7:28pm
I’m not arguing that there wasn’t forcible contact to the head or neck area. I’m arguing that there isn’t conclusive
Skeptical Optimist
Jan 1, 7:42pm
Apparently not all of us...
SoCalCoug
Jan 1, 7:47pm
Me reading posts from people who don’t see clear helmet to helmet contact:
bluesloth
Jan 1, 7:52pm
Define forcible contact, or rather tell me the NCAA's definition of it. It doesn't exist. That's why it's subjective.
Radioactive Coug
Jan 1, 10:25pm
The face mask is part of the helmet
cwilke1
Jan 1, 7:32pm
A key part of the rule: “When in question, it is a foul.”
Odysseus
Jan 1, 8:28pm
This is the strongest case against an ambiguous definition of forcible contact.
Radioactive Coug
Jan 1, 10:27pm
Yup. It was targeting. How many here would have been angry if it was called?
Borg
Jan 1, 10:29pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
