I don’t get it either, I guess, trying to set up the win….

Report problem with this ad

Oct 15, 2024
8:22:00am

JOPE Resident Golf Fanatic

but if you wanted to do that, why not do that at the end

Report problem with this ad

JOPE

Bio page: JOPE
Joined: Oct 4, 2001
Last login: Oct 15, 2024
Total posts: 48,178 (9,521 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

It’s 34-19 and Arizona goes for 2. Why did they go for 2 in that situation. What

BYU-Ite

8:20am

If they could have scored 2 TDs + 2 x 2 point conversions the score would have

Hinta

8:21am

I don’t get it either, I guess, trying to set up the win….

JOPE

8:22am

Because you can go for it a second time if you don’t get it the first and tie

puntersarepeople

8:25am

I think they were hoping they could get the 2pt, get another touchdown

Ungoy

8:22am

I also thought that going for a FG when down by 3 scores with 9 minutes left was an odd choice

Skeptical Optimist

8:23am

They were down 3 scores at that point, 17 pts. FG cuts it to 14 - two scores

Captain Stubing

8:31am

It was the right call, it got them within 2 scores, but settling for the FG

Corn Pop

8:32am

Optics. 21 looks better than 19.

BlueFever

8:26am

It’s about going for the win rather than going for the tie and hoping for OT

TCuz

8:27am

This, it's a math coaching thing. When down by multiple scores late in the game,

thecave

8:35am

going for the win.

Belboz

8:33am

Better question, why call all the time outs when BYU was trying to end the game?

Benfica1

8:34am

I like the idea of playing to win. I think it was the right move.

Posting on CougarBoard