The poster above used a post as evidence that Veddarhall was right. I provided a post showing evidence that same exact information used as supporting evidence was already public so therefore the "evidence" of him being right is negated by it being old news by then.
Doesn't matter if he had another source and was right or was copying the first post... The point stands that his post about utah going to the Pac 10 can't logically support the theory he knew first cause he didn't obviously.