Home Page
Message Board
News
Search
Events
Sports
Schedule
Future Schedules
Opponent Boards
Bracket Challenges
Player Interviews
Player Q&As
Social Boards
Football
Basketball
Fans
Fun Features
Post of the Day
Best of...
Visualizations
Store
My Account
Login
Sign Up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Mar 23, 2025
10:44
:52
pm
garyfan
Truly Addicted User
No. Put it this way, if a single conference had 64 teams make the tournament,
it’s cumulative total would be 0.00, by definition.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Mar 23, 2025 at 10:44:52pm
Message modified by garyfan on Mar 23, 2025 at 10:45:33pm
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
garyfan
Bio page
garyfan
Joined
Sep 19, 2013
Last login
Apr 2, 2025
Total posts
41,392 (4,264 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
In terms on reaching the Sweet 16, no conference outperformed expectations more
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:34pm
Don't you need to divide those totals by the number of teams?
tkh9
Mar 23, 10:37pm
No. Having more times gives a conference (like the SEC) more opportunity to
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:40pm
So the “expectation” was they’d have more teams in?
HRCougar
Mar 23, 10:42pm
No. Put it this way, if a single conference had 64 teams make the tournament,
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:44pm
Isn’t that like saying the SEC was .500 in conference play?
HRCougar
Mar 23, 10:47pm
It’s saying the metric isn’t biased in favor of conferences with a lot of teams
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:49pm
I think you should look up "self-fulfilling prophecy".
tkh9
Mar 23, 10:55pm
I think you should ask your math teacher for a refund.
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:57pm
But that’s not correct, even if you keep saying it.
HRCougar
Mar 23, 11:00pm
It’s not true that Conference B “was supposed to get four in and got four”
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:08pm
Just now realizing you listed teams who didn’t make it and gave them negative
HRCougar
Mar 23, 11:18pm
Not sure what you mean. This is only based on teams that made the tournament.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:21pm
But, it's still biased in favor of conferences that get more teams in.
Cosmo's Uncle
Mar 23, 11:14pm
But it wouldn’t automatically place that conference in third.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:19pm
That still ignores that the only reason you could say that the SEC and Big 10
Cosmo's Uncle
Mar 23, 11:36pm
Are you arguing that the metric favors the B1G because it had 8 teams in the
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:43pm
Normalization yo
Celeritas
Mar 23, 10:42pm
Yep dude is using lies, dang lies, and statistics.
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:24pm
RE: Yep dude is using lies dang lies and statistics.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:30pm
57% of big 12 teams made the sweet 16 (4/7)only 50% of Sec teams 7/14 made it
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:31pm
Why do you think it’s ok to ignore seeding? By the way, there’s a reason the OP
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:35pm
I am not ignoring it. You’re just stating it’s the only variable which it’s not.
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:36pm
See below. LOL.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:45pm
So without Arkansas making the sweet 16, the Big12 would be ahead of the sec.
cmoney
Mar 23, 10:41pm
Or if ISU hadn’t sucked today, the Big 12 would be ahead of the SEC.
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:50pm
This is basically, which conference had the lowest seeds make the sweet 16 😅
BYUFootballisBack
Mar 23, 10:42pm
Or high-seeded teams that had an early exit (Iowa St.).
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:44pm
So if I’m reading this correctly, the SEC
Toubibe
Mar 23, 10:45pm
RE: So if I’m reading this correctly, the SEC
garyfan
Mar 23, 10:45pm
Then there's Duke representing the ACC.
BigHouse Coug
Mar 23, 10:55pm
Yeah, here’s the ACC:
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:02pm
57% of big 12 teams made the sweet 16 (4/7)only 50% of Sec teams 7/14 made it
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:29pm
That’s a metric, but it’s pretty lazy because it ignores seeding.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:33pm
And you are ignoring all sorts of other variables. How far did they travel, what
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:35pm
A guy who wants to ignore seeding altogether is saying a separate approach is
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:44pm
I gave you a counter statistic that proves the big 12 is better. There’s lots of
johnnybyu
Mar 23, 11:46pm
The only one using words like “prove” to describe their metric is you.
garyfan
Mar 23, 11:53pm
I am showing you why there are lies, darn lies, and statistics. Lots of ways to
johnnybyu
Mar 24, 12:21am
It’s obvious that there are many ways to look at the data. But I’m pretty sure
garyfan
Mar 24, 12:31am
Why do the 10th and 11th seeded teams have better odds of making the Sweet 16...
Les IsMore
Mar 24, 12:47am
Because in order to reach the Sweet 16, the 8/9 seeds have to beat the 1-seed,
garyfan
Mar 24, 1:26am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad