My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Mar 22, 2025
11:00
:20
pm
Born2Fish
All-American
Freaking Mose
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Born2Fish
Bio page
Born2Fish
Joined
May 14, 2008
Last login
Mar 25, 2025
Total posts
41,502 (4,177 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Baker’s nut jab: what’s your take? I thought the call was ridiculous because
monteburns
Mar 22, 10:17pm
Horrible call. Maaaaaaaaaybe a foul. A flagrant 2??? No chance
RGGeemer
Mar 22, 10:18pm
What’s wild is they called a foul on the defender until Dwight shrute’s cousin
titlecoug
Mar 22, 10:18pm
MOSE!
VinnyBYU
Mar 22, 10:24pm
Freaking Mose
Born2Fish
Mar 22, 11:00pm
Seems obvious that's the case. Yet the refs saw "clearly NOT incidental contact"
The Dark Knight
Mar 22, 10:18pm
Then the reffing expert on the broadcast says it was incidental
stoils
Mar 22, 10:25pm
This: Refs had to determine it was clearly non-incidental, which is what they...
CougaReb
Mar 22, 10:36pm
I used to think you're crazy, but ...
Bob Vance
Mar 22, 10:19pm
I’m fine with a flagrant 1. Flagrant 2 was criminal.
TPcoug
Mar 22, 10:19pm
My understanding it has to be a no call or a flagrant 2 in that situation. They need a modifier for incidental contact
Osteotome
Mar 22, 10:20pm
It wasn’t a flagrant of any sort. 2nd defender pushing him into own guys nuts?
Rexy Coug
Mar 22, 10:21pm
I don’t think it should have been called. Just saying if you HAVE to call it
TPcoug
Mar 22, 10:24pm
Watch it closely, the player that got hit deliberately leans his crotch forward
Zerigke Ally Zerigke
Mar 22, 10:20pm
Intentional elbow, unintentional target. Dumb rule. Shouldn't have called it anything.
supertux
Mar 22, 10:20pm
deliberate nut punch should be flagrant 2
LMeyer
Mar 22, 10:21pm
Dumb rule maybe the way it is written, but Good call.
WizeGuise
Mar 22, 10:22pm
No it wasn’t not even by the rule book
BYU '80
Mar 22, 10:23pm
It was incidental contact on a normal basketball play. Shouldn’t have been a
MisterFundamentals
Mar 22, 10:23pm
It was clearly incidental.
JuicyJam
Mar 22, 10:25pm
The problem is. According to the rules any contact to the groin that isn’t 100%
Powerbait DPM
Mar 22, 10:32pm
It was accidental. Clearly. What makes you think there was any intent to hit him
Rexy Coug
Mar 22, 10:42pm
Yup I think so too. The problem was the direct contact after bending down.
Powerbait DPM
Mar 22, 10:46pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad