No it wasn’t not even by the rule book

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Mar 22, 2025
10:23:12pm

BYU '80 Truly Addicted User

No it wasn’t not even by the rule book

Report problem with this ad

BYU '80

Bio page: BYU '80
Joined: Jan 11, 2006
Last login: Mar 25, 2025
Total posts: 58,675 (168 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Baker’s nut jab: what’s your take? I thought the call was ridiculous because

monteburns

Mar 22, 10:17pm

Horrible call. Maaaaaaaaaybe a foul. A flagrant 2??? No chance

RGGeemer

Mar 22, 10:18pm

What’s wild is they called a foul on the defender until Dwight shrute’s cousin

titlecoug

Mar 22, 10:18pm

MOSE!

VinnyBYU

Mar 22, 10:24pm

Freaking Mose

Born2Fish

Mar 22, 11:00pm

Seems obvious that's the case. Yet the refs saw "clearly NOT incidental contact"

The Dark Knight

Mar 22, 10:18pm

Then the reffing expert on the broadcast says it was incidental

stoils

Mar 22, 10:25pm

This: Refs had to determine it was clearly non-incidental, which is what they...

CougaReb

Mar 22, 10:36pm

I used to think you're crazy, but ...

Bob Vance

Mar 22, 10:19pm

I’m fine with a flagrant 1. Flagrant 2 was criminal.

TPcoug

Mar 22, 10:19pm

My understanding it has to be a no call or a flagrant 2 in that situation. They need a modifier for incidental contact

Osteotome

Mar 22, 10:20pm

It wasn’t a flagrant of any sort. 2nd defender pushing him into own guys nuts?

Rexy Coug

Mar 22, 10:21pm

I don’t think it should have been called. Just saying if you HAVE to call it

TPcoug

Mar 22, 10:24pm

Watch it closely, the player that got hit deliberately leans his crotch forward

Zerigke Ally Zerigke

Mar 22, 10:20pm

Intentional elbow, unintentional target. Dumb rule. Shouldn't have called it anything.

supertux

Mar 22, 10:20pm

deliberate nut punch should be flagrant 2

LMeyer

Mar 22, 10:21pm

Dumb rule maybe the way it is written, but Good call.

WizeGuise

Mar 22, 10:22pm

No it wasn’t not even by the rule book

BYU '80

Mar 22, 10:23pm

It was incidental contact on a normal basketball play. Shouldn’t have been a

MisterFundamentals

Mar 22, 10:23pm

It was clearly incidental.

JuicyJam

Mar 22, 10:25pm

The problem is. According to the rules any contact to the groin that isn’t 100%

Powerbait DPM

Mar 22, 10:32pm

It was accidental. Clearly. What makes you think there was any intent to hit him

Rexy Coug

Mar 22, 10:42pm

Yup I think so too. The problem was the direct contact after bending down.

Powerbait DPM

Mar 22, 10:46pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad