a question, there is a targeting foul, and if there is a question, the player is defenseless.

I need to hear an explanation from the refs why they felt there wasn't a question if there was forcible contact to the head or neck area, because even though I have argued here that there isn't clear evidence of forcible contact to the head or neck area and it could have been to the chest as part of a legal tackle, I think there's plenty of questions about that call. And in a regular season game it would have been flagged every time.