Would have been ASU ball since they had possession when the play occurred

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 2, 2025
9:20:44am

BYUCLA All-American

Would have been ASU ball since they had possession when the play occurred

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Jan 2, 2025 at 9:20:44am

Message modified by BYUCLA on Jan 2, 2025 at 9:29:10am

Message modified by BYUCLA on Jan 2, 2025 at 9:29:17am

Message modified by BYUCLA on Jan 2, 2025 at 10:00:33am

Report problem with this ad

BYUCLA

Previous username: jco77
Bio page: BYUCLA
Joined: Jul 23, 2012
Last login: Jan 4, 2025
Total posts: 5,576 (4 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

There were two potential targeting calls in the 4th quarter of the ASU game, one by each team. On the ASU INT, there is

Spiff SequelTrilogyFan

Jan 2, 8:19am

It would have negated the interception.

TN_Coug

Jan 2, 8:32am

Terry McAulay says likely still ASU INT

squirrelyearl

Jan 2, 8:33am

"at the same time" means bang-bang play and would have negated it.

TN_Coug

Jan 2, 8:35am

"or slightly before"

Spiff

Jan 2, 8:42am

I saw that, but he wrote both things. If watching it back he's still not sure if its same-time or slightly before it

TN_Coug

Jan 2, 8:54am

I think the refs made the right call...it was not targeting.

WJCougar

Jan 2, 8:36am

I thought that could have been called targeting as well, which just proves to me

NOCAL_YFAN

Jan 2, 8:36am

Would have been ASU ball since they had possession when the play occurred

BYUCLA

Jan 2, 9:20am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad