My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 26, 2024
7:23
:16
pm
JAGA97
All-American
I can't be critical of it because I am not confident BYU can beat any of the
top 20 teams right now.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
JAGA97
Bio page
JAGA97
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Last login
Nov 26, 2024
Total posts
25,549 (18 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Clemson vs. BYU Resumes
d10e15
7:05pm
Logo and preseason expectations
Mr. Scoobs
7:05pm
And Clemson got pounded in both games
BYU '80
7:06pm
Clemson and Alabama are ranked where they are based on brand alone.
Shinshin
7:06pm
Sure, I’ll make it make sense for you. Sagarin: Clemson #17 BYU #28 FPI: Clemson #14 BYU #30 SP+: Clemson #15 BYU #18
TCuz
7:07pm
Garbage metrics used only when convenient
coug10278
7:08pm
FPI isn’t a real metric
puntersarepeople
7:09pm
Ok, add KFord: Clemson #13 BYU #28 and Massey: Clemson #15 BYU #18
TCuz
7:11pm
Two of the metrics you’ve used have a very slight edge to Clemson
puntersarepeople
7:16pm
Resume metrics also matter. I’m not saying they don’t. But every efficiency metric favors Clemson
TCuz
7:19pm
Maybe you just can’t read
puntersarepeople
7:22pm
I can read fine. You only care about the resume metrics and want to exclude all efficiency metrics
TCuz
7:23pm
Edited for clarity
puntersarepeople
7:26pm
Doesn’t FPI still have USC is at like 15 with their 5 losses
Kolipoki
7:11pm
It loves high recruiting rankings which artificially props up bluebloods
puntersarepeople
7:12pm
Well clearly if there is a result or two by the metrics you don’t like you just throw it out completely.
TCuz
7:13pm
Throwing out bad data is something scientists do all the time
puntersarepeople
7:18pm
Make the objective rankings as subjective as possible! Redo it until we agree with the AP Poll!!
TCuz
7:22pm
I don’t think you understand science very well
puntersarepeople
7:25pm
Can you make those rankings make sense? If byu has played a tougher schedule
bulletproof
7:14pm
They are efficiency metrics. It’s like KenPom in basketball. It’s how well you have played in games
TCuz
7:17pm
The problem with computer rankings in college football is they use data from
RGGeemer
7:24pm
No, that’s not why BYU is low at all. Why is Indiana ranked so highly in most of them then?
TCuz
7:27pm
That Kansas loss at home along with close wins over OSU and Utah torpedoed us
AF Cougar
7:07pm
Yet close wins over zero mwc win Nevada (3-8) by 6 and 2-9 Wyoming by four
BYU '80
7:11pm
Losses to top 10 teams (like Georgia and Oregon) don't hurt a team
krindorr
7:19pm
But apparently a 5 pt loss on the road to the #21 team drops you 5 spots
CaliWG
7:41pm
I love that bama cannot torpedo their season
NYCougz
7:23pm
The last 4 games, BYU won by two miracles against the two worst teams in the
idcougarfan
7:13pm
I can't be critical of it because I am not confident BYU can beat any of the
JAGA97
7:23pm
I dont think Clemson could beat a top 20 team as they haven’t.
NYCougz
7:28pm
In fairness Clemson beat..
NYCougz
7:27pm
BYU has squeaked by all year, analytics don't like them
Projectoor
7:29pm
Clemson squeaked by teams that aren’t good.
NYCougz
7:31pm
True, but Clemson has been much more efficient overall
Projectoor
7:35pm
The got crushed by the two good teams they played
CaliWG
7:41pm
Not “much” better
NYCougz
7:49pm
They haven’t lost to teams that are bad.
RealTaysomHill
7:39pm
Neither have we. And we have a win that is way better than anything they have.
NYCougz
7:48pm
It's about when you lose
Zerigke Ally Zerigke
7:58pm
A lot of truth to this
NYCougz
8:46pm
I’m a big Clemson fan and there is no justification for them to be ranked
AeroCoug
8:19pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad