My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Sep 5, 2024
11:42
:35
am
shokupanmanbo
All-American
I've heard 220-age but have never multiplied by .66. That results in absurdly low rates.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
shokupanmanbo
Bio page
shokupanmanbo
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Last login
Nov 9, 2024
Total posts
2,374 (50 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
What’s the reasoning behind Age being a factor in the optimal fat burning zone….
kotacoug
Sep 5, 10:39am
I've heard 220-age but have never multiplied by .66. That results in absurdly low rates.
shokupanmanbo
Sep 5, 11:42am
220 - age = Max HR. This is upper limit of Zone 5 training. Fat burn is Zone 2.
Unfrozen Caveman
Sep 5, 2:27pm
that makes sense
shokupanmanbo
Sep 5, 3:42pm
If your max heart rate lowers as you age, wouldn’t the optimal fat burning also
Superkid
Sep 5, 12:16pm
180 - age = the upper limit of zone 2. Subtract 5 if you’re out of shape.
Unfrozen Caveman
Sep 5, 1:09pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
