Oct 23, 2017
11:43:44am
11:43:44am
Losing by 20 points is worse. What’s the point in making a change if it is likely going to be worse?
Yes. Losing is losing. But you have to go with the guy that gives you the “best” chance even if that chance isn’t very good. If you go with the guy that loses by 20 instead of 17 and completes a lower percentage and makes more mistakes, he probably didn’t give you the best chance.
I know people want to just put him in and let’s see what happens but coaches can see these guys. They know what they are getting and they know who gives us the best chance even if it’s not a very good one.
I’d buy into the “give Hoge a shot” argument. Critchlow? A walk-in from SUU? He’s the answer many fans believe in?
I know people want to just put him in and let’s see what happens but coaches can see these guys. They know what they are getting and they know who gives us the best chance even if it’s not a very good one.
I’d buy into the “give Hoge a shot” argument. Critchlow? A walk-in from SUU? He’s the answer many fans believe in?
- Previous username
- ItsBYU4me
- Bio page
- The Dude Abides
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2007
- Last login
- May 17, 2020
- Total posts
- 48,609 (17,534 FO)
Messages
Time
10/23/17 11:14am
10/23/17 11:15am
10/23/17 2:10pm
10/23/17 11:30am
10/23/17 11:38am
Losing by 20 points is worse. What’s the point in making a change if it is likely going to be worse?
10/23/17 11:43am
10/23/17 11:33am
10/23/17 11:25am
10/23/17 11:21am
10/23/17 3:25pm
10/23/17 12:37pm
10/23/17 1:20pm
10/23/17 2:18pm
10/23/17 1:16pm
10/23/17 2:09pm
10/23/17 5:56pm