This is where it bugs me. If there’s no video review coming I doubt any ref has the balls to huddle and override the guy

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 23, 2024
1:00:39pm

mvtoro Scrub

This is where it bugs me. If there’s no video review coming I doubt any ref has the balls to huddle and override the guy

who was standing right there.

But because it’s doing to video review it’ll be caught if we’re incorrect, right?

Wrong. Video view will be worse and it will just stand.

Video made the refs worse on that call instead of better. Because it made them lazy.

Report problem with this ad

mvtoro

Bio page: mvtoro
Joined: Nov 28, 2006
Last login: Sep 23, 2024
Total posts: 12,708 (803 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Still no explanation for that terrible review that gave KSU 3 points.

The Y's Insider

12:48pm

There was not a good video angle of where the ball was when his toe hit the sideline...

Coug

12:50pm

There were 2 angles that showed his foot on the line and the ball at ~ the 1/2

The Y's Insider

12:52pm

ESPN showed a very clear angle. Both commentators were shocked at the ruling

Saxa

12:52pm

Huh? They had the angle right on the goalline

The Dark Knight

12:54pm

This was the smaller problem. It was clear when his foot touched down that the ball was short. (You can use info from 2

mvtoro

12:56pm

Like this one?

fldnstrm

1:00pm

Looks like the shadow of the ball is clearly in the endzone. Touchdown!

JAGA97

1:02pm

Video replay of the refs on Saturday night:

Doogal McCougar

1:02pm

Yes, precisely like that one. Too bad no such picture exists.

Jacksonian76

3:14pm

The crew from the 2005 TCU game made an appearance

Indy Coug

12:52pm

I was late for a date and in a bad mood because of that. Thanks for the reminder

BlueTroop

3:10pm

That was the first season of ByU football that I followed. That loss hurt bad

CougarEat

3:54pm

It’s the “stands” vs “confirmed”. Call on the field was apparently going to stand either way. But WHY did they

mvtoro

12:53pm

The change to the on the field call is what I don't understand

The Dark Knight

12:55pm

This is where it bugs me. If there’s no video review coming I doubt any ref has the balls to huddle and override the guy

mvtoro

1:00pm

Both

SoBlueitHurts

2:55pm

The only explanation that makes sense in my mind is that the official mis-spoke.

Mufasa

12:55pm

No. They actually called it a TD LONG after the play and while huddled.

The Y's Insider

12:57pm

Ah... I missed that part.

Mufasa

12:58pm

1) No. They announced TD as ruling on the field. 2) No way that video “overturns” a call that he stepped out.

mvtoro

12:57pm

Why? He was very clearly short

BYU '80

5:09pm

Maybe they were confused on the standard to overturn the call. They thought they needed something clearer

Bob Vance

1:01pm

The more egregious error IMO was overriding (in huddle) the call of the ref who was closest to the play. I don’t think

mvtoro

1:04pm

I’m not sure us getting the ball at the 1/2 yard line would have been the best outcome.

SpecialT

1:11pm

??? A turnover on downs at the 1/2 yard line is definitely better than giving up a field goal. I know there is risk of

mvtoro

1:16pm

The refs are allowed to huddle, ask each other if another had a better angle or

Corn Pop

1:17pm

The line judge right at the play showed us all his call with his signal. Whoever in the huddle overruled or convinced

mvtoro

1:21pm

I'm never a fan of a far away ref/ump overruling the closer one to the play, but

Corn Pop

1:26pm

I am never a fan of any ref overturning a call that hurts BYU...ever.

Pangare

2:19pm

If the call on the field had been, "out of bounds at the 1/2 yd line",

PacificNW

3:52pm

...and that WAS the call of the line judge at the spot.

The Dark Knight

4:15pm

Confirmed...terrible review.

PacificNW

4:44pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad