since I'm probably one of the guys you're talking to.

What I'm hearing from you is that we shouldn't criticize Crowton or discuss uncomfortable issues just because.

You say the good to bad ratio is 200:10. Coming off the worst year in 30, I don't see it that way. I see a coach that looked like a genius in 2001 and a fool in 2002. I'm wondering which one it is. And I'm discussing it with my Cougar brethren. I don't think anyone here's testimony of the Cougs is too weak to be able to handle a little intellectual discussion.

What I really don't like is when people try to quash anything remotely anti-Crowton just because it feels like murmuring or speaking ill of the Lord's annointed. That's a very immature view, IMHO.

There's very little content in either of our posts. It would be more interesting for us all to talk specifics about what Crowton's doing positive and negative, than these kind of posts.