Apr 1, 2025
2:39:17pm
2:39:17pm
So when you say "limit", you just mean they'd have the ability to potentially
negate a deal where the person/company handing out the money was deemed to have not actually used the Athlete's NIL for which they paid.
That still would not be a limit on NIL money as, again, SCOTUS has decided that the athletes themselves own their NIL. That decision is not being undone, ever.
How do you think enforcement would go on that? Who is doing the reviewing? How would they decide if somebody was overpaid for their NIL? What would be the punishments? Would the SEC and B10 accept it, or finally walk away?
That still would not be a limit on NIL money as, again, SCOTUS has decided that the athletes themselves own their NIL. That decision is not being undone, ever.
How do you think enforcement would go on that? Who is doing the reviewing? How would they decide if somebody was overpaid for their NIL? What would be the punishments? Would the SEC and B10 accept it, or finally walk away?
- Previous username
- Corn Pop
- Bio page
- Ghost of Peanut
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2009
- Last login
- Apr 4, 2025
- Total posts
- 96,954 (6,754 FO)
Messages
Time
Apr 1, 2:11pm
Apr 1, 2:12pm
They wouldn't be Capping NIL, they would be capping the amount the School would be paying the players. NIL would
Apr 1, 2:19pm
Apr 1, 2:27pm
Apr 1, 2:31pm
It isn't going to hold up in court so it is a temporary fix at best. How the NCAA thinks they can limit what
Apr 1, 2:25pm