Not incidental contact was the ruling. Incidental to that area though

Report problem with this ad

Mar 22, 2025
9:32:59pm

RGGeemer Intervention Needed

Not incidental contact was the ruling. Incidental to that area though

Dumb ruling

Report problem with this ad

RGGeemer

Previous username: rggee
Bio page: RGGeemer
Joined: Aug 18, 2010
Last login: Apr 2, 2025
Total posts: 74,373 (786 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I hope the NCAA doesn’t treat Flagrant 2 like targeting

Cooouuugs

Mar 22, 9:21pm

If it is for fighting, I think it is. Dawson won't be suspended

RGGeemer

Mar 22, 9:22pm

Just talking about this as well. Don't think it does but not sure. Keba and the

Mar 22, 9:23pm

Anyone know the rule for that? Can Dawson play the next game?

CrimWalCoug

Mar 22, 9:23pm

Link says he's good to go in the Sweet 16

RGGeemer

Mar 22, 9:23pm

I still don’t understand this rule

4n18

Mar 22, 9:27pm

Not incidental contact was the ruling. Incidental to that area though

RGGeemer

Mar 22, 9:32pm

So not incidental because he tried to split the defenders?

4n18

Mar 22, 9:36pm

I guess. Like I say I think it's a dumb ruling.

RGGeemer

Mar 22, 9:40pm

Very dumb

4n18

Mar 22, 9:42pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad