My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 6, 2025
10:29
:45
am
Baron
Sovereign User
Narrator: No it is not.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Baron
Previous username
jarocho
Bio page
Baron
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Last login
Jan 7, 2025
Total posts
99,902 (34,786 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
I feel this guy's pain.
maYbe
Jan 6, 10:28am
Narrator: No it is not.
Baron
Jan 6, 10:29am
If you are traveling from out of state it absolutely is.
rad dawg
Jan 6, 10:59am
I am from out of state. Direct flights to and ignoring the lost time due to jet lag, it is cheaper to go to Utah.
Baron
Jan 6, 11:04am
The flight is more expensive for me too. Now calculate comparable lodging.
rad dawg
Jan 6, 11:15am
Also important to keep in mind this is comparing Snowbird to Zermatt.
rad dawg
Jan 6, 11:18am
Lol, even if you pay $400 for a day pass, $100 for lift fees, $200 for rentals, it's still cheaper to ski in Utah
RSL
Jan 6, 10:33am
Not remotely true, but I sure hope the out of staters thinks so and quit
neboutefan
Jan 6, 11:08am
My comparison of Brighton and Davos from Washington DC.
goldengoose
Jan 6, 11:09am
add lodging. Switzerland wins.
reagan21
Jan 6, 1:04pm
Those flights are not non-stop and add an extra day on both ends for Switzerland.
Baron
Jan 6, 1:08pm
I pretty easily found the round trip flights at the prices he stated.
rad dawg
Jan 6, 2:52pm
Sorry I meant non-stop. Fixed. I can't find any nonstop flights close to that. And then if you add legs and travel time.
Baron
Jan 6, 2:55pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
