My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 5, 2025
9:38
:55
pm
DieHarder
Truly Addicted User
It looks better than it did at the time, but I just hate that when you draft a
RB early you only get 3/4 cheap years out of them, and even if they’re awesome they’ll probably be washed before that second contract is up.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
DieHarder
Previous username
ChairmanOfTheBoard
Bio page
DieHarder
Joined
Aug 13, 2016
Last login
Jan 7, 2025
Total posts
42,844 (4,538 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Remember when the Lions were highly criticized for reaching to draft a RB (Jahmyr Gibbs) at 12? Lol
RdF3
Inactive user
Jan 5, 9:25pm
He is freaking good. With that line, he is unreal.
NYCougz
Jan 5, 9:29pm
I still think it was a bad idea. RBs aren't worth that cost
Belboz
Jan 5, 9:32pm
That crazy. Gibbs does everything for them on offense.
RdF3
Jan 5, 9:33pm
And RBs will have success playing behind that offensive line
Belboz
Jan 5, 9:35pm
Drafting backs high works. It’s just not overpaying them after that first
NYCougz
Jan 5, 9:38pm
I’d rather draft someone that I want to give a second contract early in R1.
DieHarder
Jan 5, 9:39pm
I'd rather draft a guy in first round who plays in a more expensive position
Belboz
Jan 5, 9:40pm
It looks better than it did at the time, but I just hate that when you draft a
DieHarder
Jan 5, 9:38pm
If the Lions don’t win it all this year they’ll have a hard time getting back.
DKN
Jan 5, 9:43pm
They have a surplus of talent from their Goff/Stafford trade on rookie deals
scrambled egg
Jan 5, 9:50pm
It’s like the Jordan Love pick. Bad process, good result anyway.
TCuz
Jan 5, 9:43pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad