And assuming good faith with ESPN is far more ridiculous, naive, or just plain

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 3, 2025
2:25:59pm

Mitty Truly Addicted User

And assuming good faith with ESPN is far more ridiculous, naive, or just plain

stupid.

Report problem with this ad

Mitty

Previous username: ArchbishopMitty
Bio page: Mitty
Joined: Nov 16, 2012
Last login: Jan 5, 2025
Total posts: 15,651 (4 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

ESPN FPI: The purpose of a system is what it does

Bobber Contributor

Jan 3, 2:13pm

Assuming bad faith because you disagree with the results is ridiculous.

TCuz

Jan 3, 2:18pm

And assuming good faith with ESPN is far more ridiculous, naive, or just plain

Mitty

Jan 3, 2:25pm

It's not like they don't have competition in this space

bythenumbers

Jan 3, 3:40pm

No, reality disagrees with the results

Bobber

Jan 3, 3:27pm

You can empirically test its accuracy.

Indy Coug

Jan 3, 2:19pm

According to this, it's one of the best out there when it comes to predicting

cougarfan84

Jan 3, 2:25pm

It’s toasting most of the other 54 rankings listed.

Indy Coug

Jan 3, 2:27pm

There is a lot of variation year to year in which model performs the best

bythenumbers

Jan 3, 3:43pm

I saw your post on this earlier.

fanbraves10

Jan 3, 2:43pm

The top 40 rating systems are all between 69-72% accurate at predicting the winner?

Bobber

Jan 3, 3:15pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad