My Account
Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 1, 2025
2:47
:04
pm
VACOUGFAN
Truly Addicted User
Had no interest in creating more controversy. If it was reversed however
(meaning it was Texas being targeted) They'd still be talking about the egregious targeting no call.
But we all know that would have absolutely been confirmed targeting if the shoe was on the other foot.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Jan 1, 2025 at 2:47:04pm
Message modified by VACOUGFAN on Jan 1, 2025 at 7:31:37pm
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
VACOUGFAN
Bio page
VACOUGFAN
Joined
Sep 5, 2001
Last login
Jan 4, 2025
Total posts
64,144 (19,965 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Observation - Announcers have zero interest telling us why that wasn't targeting
jrifkin48
Jan 1, 2:45pm
What are they going to say? They have no idea why it wasn't called.
brj8
Jan 1, 2:45pm
So put the rules analyst back on and have him try to explain it.
BoiseBlueCoug
Jan 1, 2:46pm
So he can say what he said before—that it probably should have been targeting?
Ski-U-Mah
Jan 1, 2:50pm
Exactly. Defender led with his helmet. Helmet to helmet contact was made.
jrifkin48
Jan 1, 2:51pm
Had no interest in creating more controversy. If it was reversed however
VACOUGFAN
Jan 1, 2:47pm
It was THE definition of targeting
Borg
Jan 1, 2:52pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad