That’s pretty sensationalized.

Nov 26, 2024
2:47:29pm

ponys All-American

He makes it seems like with one ICBM Russia can disable NATO forces globally. Even if this weapon has the effects he is claiming, why wouldn’t the US still just use nukes after the first strike?

Report problem with this ad

ponys

Bio page: ponys
Joined: May 23, 2013
Last login: Nov 26, 2024
Total posts: 3,832 (47 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Thoughts about the weapon Russia just showed? This guy is pretty spun up. Not interested in political side, just tech.

Radioactive Coug Sometimes Coherant

2:39pm

He cited two time convicted sex offender and well known employee of the

oxcoug

2:42pm

if you can't trust the #1 bestselling author of "Food Forensics" on this matter

Buffalo

2:43pm

Ha, didn't recognize the names and didn't bother looking them up.

Radioactive Coug

2:44pm

Yeah, that name stuck out for me as well. Pretty safe to believe the opposite of

bluesloth

2:51pm

Even these guys think that was a little over the top

darkcoug

2:45pm

Also, given that their one vaunted test of it basically blew up part of a

oxcoug

2:46pm

That’s pretty sensationalized.

ponys

2:47pm

Wouldnt THAAD or even Patriot be able to handle if they shot at NATO or us?

pegushin

4:04pm

Yes. It's always important to determine if the target that a missile struck was

Emmett Fitz-Hume

4:42pm

That read like some dystopian novel. It sounds hyperbolic and sensationalized. It is unlikely to have any basis in fact

Baron

2:51pm

Every propaganda piece is the same. [Other side] is on the brink of collapse

rcbyufan

2:53pm

It also assumes other countries don't have hypersonic programs

justAnotherCoug

2:53pm

That's some of the funniest defense analysis I've read in a long time. I wish

Emmett Fitz-Hume

3:03pm

If this was that, Russia would already have been leveraging it. They didn’t sit

Socrates Johnson

3:06pm

I love this first reply

Posting on CougarBoard