I believe this is correct. And we would have got the ball at the spot where he threw it

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 25, 2024
11:48:56am

Skeptical Optimist Intervention Needed

I believe this is correct. And we would have got the ball at the spot where he threw it

Report problem with this ad

Skeptical Optimist

Previous username: workindev
Bio page: Skeptical Optimist
Joined: Aug 2, 2006
Last login: Nov 25, 2024
Total posts: 84,723 (4,491 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Somebody can check me but *if* they called intentional grounding, it wouldn't

rcbyufan

11:48am

I believe this is correct. And we would have got the ball at the spot where he threw it

Skeptical Optimist

11:48am

This is why the strategy was so dumb IMO.

rcbyufan

11:50am

Amazingly stupid strategy

Skeptical Optimist

11:51am

It would have been a good strategy if they had *punted* instead of the throw

RGGeemer

11:53am

Yes.

rcbyufan

11:54am

Michigan:

Skeptical Optimist

12:01pm

The stupid thing was ASU could have just had QB sprint to the right to get out

ybecausethatswhy

11:59am

I thought we did get the ball at the spot where he threw it. That's what Kalani

momowagon

11:52am

We didn't. It was 4th down on the 50 (where we got it). Leavitt threw it from

RGGeemer

11:52am

Not even closed we got screwed out of 9 or 10 yards

11:53am

Correct.

RGGeemer

11:50am

At the time, it was actually awarded incorrectly, though. They have since

RGGeemer

11:52am

That's the game.

rcbyufan

11:54am

That's where I do wish Kalani would work the refs more. Intentional grounding is

BYUHawk

12:02pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad