yeah... agree. Those numbers dont actually seem very scientific. I see plenty

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 10, 2024
5:55:12pm

Pablo Bot Contributor

yeah... agree. Those numbers dont actually seem very scientific. I see plenty

of games come back from 99.7 range. It should take many many years for that to happen even once if their numbers were real.

Report problem with this ad

Pablo Bot

Previous username: cougardavis
Bio page: Pablo Bot
Joined: Sep 11, 2008
Last login: Nov 13, 2024
Total posts: 472 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

According to ESPN analytics, Utah had a 99.7% chance of winning on the

Rhubarb

Nov 10, 5:46pm

These percentages are tough for me to get.

NYCougz

Nov 10, 5:47pm

It makes sense based on previous plays and historical norms. We had a low chance of winning.

WP17

Nov 10, 5:51pm

Low for sure but 3 in 1,000?

NYCougz

Nov 10, 5:52pm

yeah... agree. Those numbers dont actually seem very scientific. I see plenty

Pablo Bot

Nov 10, 5:55pm

Exactly. The odds were very low but not get hit by lightning low

NYCougz

Nov 10, 5:57pm

Really? I think that’s probably availability bias. Most of those games end up going the way that suggests

WP17

Nov 10, 11:07pm

RE: According to ESPN analytics, Utah had a 99.7% chance of winning on the

darkcoug

Nov 10, 5:54pm

Is that ESPN football field graphic still up where you can scroll and see the analytics % change during the game?

Brisco

Nov 10, 6:34pm

Yup just scroll to the bottom

Rhubarb

Nov 10, 6:52pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad