Oct 28, 2024
3:03:09pm
3:03:09pm
It’s time to involve CB lawyers in this big 12 tiebreaker nonsense
Specifically, why did the big 12 use the word “next” in this phrase, what was their intent?
“Win % against the next highest placed common opponent in the standings proceeding through the standings”
Remove “next” and it reads different. When you have a tiebreaker with byu and Iowa St, remove next and it’s clear that the respective results against Kansas St mean BYU wins. However, by including the word next, it’s not clear that the Kansas St result will be considered.
Why would the Conference have done this and created this confusion?
“Win % against the next highest placed common opponent in the standings proceeding through the standings”
Remove “next” and it reads different. When you have a tiebreaker with byu and Iowa St, remove next and it’s clear that the respective results against Kansas St mean BYU wins. However, by including the word next, it’s not clear that the Kansas St result will be considered.
Why would the Conference have done this and created this confusion?
- Previous username
- bubbalouie
- Bio page
- Coog4Life
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2004
- Last login
- Dec 23, 2024
- Total posts
- 16,562 (410 FO)
