Unless you had Kalani on the phone during the time of the game it was 34-18

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 27, 2024
8:06:02pm

BYU '80 Intervention Needed

Unless you had Kalani on the phone during the time of the game it was 34-18

You wouldn’t have known his opinion. I’m sure Kalani wouldn’t have said the game was over though. Unless you can prove that he did.

Considering Retzlaff stayed in as well as the other offensive starters, I’m pretty darn sure Kalani didn’t think the game was over. Which is why the question came up about LJ from Greg and Hans.

Report problem with this ad

BYU '80

Bio page: BYU '80
Joined: Jan 11, 2006
Last login: Oct 27, 2024
Total posts: 53,523 (147 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

May have been discussed but did sitake discuss postgame why LJ didn’t play more

BYU '80

6:49pm

LJ himself said he’s fine

canuckchuck

6:51pm

Out for 68-74 weeks

NYCougz

6:51pm

I figured it was more precautionary than anything

SUAVO

6:51pm

Why would he play more? Why risk injury?

cougarfann888

6:51pm

When byu was starting to struggle to get first downs and the lead was 34-18

BYU '80

6:58pm

Ropati was doing really well and LJ is still coming back. Had 102 yards. No need

WP17

6:53pm

Game was over. Precautionary. No injury and making sure they keep it that way for Holy War

JohnnyComeLately

6:58pm

At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over

BYU '80

6:59pm

It was.

Conan

7:00pm

BYU had to execute multiple third downs. If they hadn’t the same guy who led

BYU '80

7:24pm

A third and then they still would have needed a fourth

cougarfann888

7:35pm

If byu had failed to get first downs and kicked a fg they would have had

BYU '80

7:49pm

I will go with Kalani’s opinion over yours and the words of LJ himself.

JohnnyComeLately

7:57pm

Unless you had Kalani on the phone during the time of the game it was 34-18

BYU '80

8:06pm

Ok. So if the game had played out differently than it did, I suspect we would have seen LJ.

Spiff

8:05pm

Considering LJ was about the only known starter not in the game at 34-18

BYU '80

8:06pm

Fine. It's a valid question. You've been given several valid answers. It's on you if you don't like them.

Spiff

8:08pm

Which answers were valid. We never got an answer. Every response here has been

BYU '80

8:19pm

I guess you're right then. He was hurt and BYU almost lost.

Spiff

8:24pm

I asked if he was hurt. At 34–18 the game wasn’t over

BYU '80

8:28pm

Maybe read my post one more time. What does precautionary mean to you?

JohnnyComeLately

8:31pm

I saw what you said. That was an opinion but never confirmed.

BYU '80

8:39pm

And he told Wrubell he was healthy. So not sure what point you are trying to make.

JohnnyComeLately

8:49pm

If the game was won, why only take him out? It’s a pretty clear point

BYU '80

10:31pm

RE: At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over

JohnnyComeLately

7:05pm

For those laughing, Greg and Hans were asking the same question on the radio

BYU '80

6:59pm

The question has been asked many times but you may not have seen

NYCougz

7:29pm

I hadn’t seen which is the reason I asked as stated in the original post

BYU '80

7:50pm

If he is hurt, sadly sitake won’t be clear about it

NYCougz

8:39pm

LJ in post game said it was a charlie horse.

Lance71

7:00pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad