Why is this superior to the gantry? Not to mention the risk of something going

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 13, 2024
12:59:55pm

SUAVO All-American

Why is this superior to the gantry? Not to mention the risk of something going

Wrong you could destroy everything if your landing isn't perfect

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Oct 13, 2024 at 12:59:55pm

Message modified by SUAVO on Oct 13, 2024 at 1:00:06pm

Report problem with this ad

SUAVO

Bio page: SUAVO
Joined: Sep 27, 2010
Last login: Oct 13, 2024
Total posts: 23,798 (2 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Another amazing shot of SpaceX

Level43

12:06pm

Inform me of the purpose of catching it instead of landing it on the ground

SUAVO

12:07pm

On one of their previous attempts it banged down pretty hard so maybe to prevent

Devbo

12:12pm

Seems that if you hit hard when you catch it you could destroy the booster

SUAVO

12:27pm

It triggers Elon haters.

Samsonite

12:12pm

Seems to be the most likely. Triggers fanboys, haters, and probably gets

SUAVO

12:29pm

Less weight and complexity in the rocket itself.

delbert

12:13pm

How? Reusable rockets have more weight because they have to have fuel for the

SUAVO

12:27pm

You eliminate the weight of the landing gear. In space travel, weight is

EQD2

12:38pm

With how cheap Elon is making these is an extra launch really that much less

SUAVO

1:05pm

Clean it, refuel it, launch it again.

Blue Print

12:15pm

Can't you do that from the ground?

SUAVO

12:25pm

No. You need the gantry to maintain, refuel, and load the astronauts.

Blue Print

12:32pm

Why is this superior to the gantry? Not to mention the risk of something going

SUAVO

12:59pm

You new to space travel?

Blue Print

1:18pm

Which you can do with a gantry crane that moves to the area you land at. And

SUAVO

1:20pm

You want to move the gas station rather than the car?

Blue Print

1:59pm

Ya, but the car has potential to spark, so you run the risk of destroying

SUAVO

2:07pm

Seems like it would be smart to have a second tower with chopsticks to catch the

delbert

2:32pm

At part of the reason IMO is to prob to display the engineering that SpaceX is capable of. SpaceX has already shown..

greatbam

12:35pm

Falcon Heavy uses the same booster as falcon 9. Do you mean super heavy?

EQD2

12:39pm

Yeah.

greatbam

12:42pm

No landing legs required. Less fuel, lower cost, more reliable, higher payload

delux_247

12:49pm

I could see not having the landing gear, but the fuel seems like it's a drop

SUAVO

12:56pm

That's crazy

Indy Coug

12:17pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad