My Account
Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Sep 28, 2024
10:04
:59
am
775coug
Contributor
It sounds like what you want is a rule change. That’s fine, but with the current
rules in a place, would you agree that the refs disregarded them to come to the conclusion they did?
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
775coug
Bio page
775coug
Joined
Sep 12, 2022
Last login
Nov 16, 2024
Total posts
888 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Refs need a training on what indisputable evidence means.
775coug
Sep 27, 10:03pm
I think making the right call based on what the review video shows should be
robin
Sep 27, 10:13pm
Disagree because that makes it so much easier for refs to be corrupt/biased
puntersarepeople
Sep 27, 10:14pm
It looks like a catch that gets ripped out after the player is on the ground.
Benfica1
Sep 27, 10:13pm
That's what I thought. I also though the previous play was clear PI.
runningfoo
Sep 27, 10:53pm
So even though you think there’s a 75% chance that the pass was incomplete, VT
Japan Coug
Sep 27, 10:37pm
I don’t make the rules. VT got robbed bc the refs didn’t follow them.
775coug
Sep 27, 11:01pm
Ok. But if it’s 75% likely the pass was dropped, wouldn’t Miami have been robbed
Japan Coug
Sep 28, 12:21am
It sounds like what you want is a rule change. That’s fine, but with the current
775coug
Sep 28, 10:04am
Can indisputable mean different things based upon the event taking place? Is the football stadium a court of law or..
greatbam
Sep 28, 3:19am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad