well as strengths of our team" bill. They aren't saying he's a terrible person, but rather pointing out specific deficiencies (ball security, missing wide open receivers, decision making), etc. That could also be said in comparisons many are making about the offensive side of the ball and the defensive side of the ball with regard to play calling, management, etc in general or the personnel in charge of them. People can also make valid criticisms of how the FB program is handled by the HC with regards to perceived lack of recruiting; for example: "if this is the best we have at QB, it shows how much Kalani and Co are dropping the ball with recruiting." That critique had merit based on the product on the field, as such it's not breaking the "be supportive" rule as it would be if someone said "Kalani sucks, he is a terrible excuse for a coach."

That said, you can always report something you believe breaks this particular rule (or any other rule). We don't read every post.