Those highlights are what we have heard in a lot of places for a while.

Is this rehashing what was already out there

Or

New sources saying what has been speculation for awhile

Or

Old sources reemphasizing same position they had before

Or

Something else

(Note ... Not attack on post...but a question of how to interpret a relatively big outlet like NY post restating what has been reported in other places for a while. What is the PR gamesmanship being played here?)