It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 9, 2025
9:00:17pm

Iman23 Truly Addicted User

It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Right.

I just don’t like the rule in that instance…

Report problem with this ad

Iman23

Bio page: Iman23
Joined: Jan 18, 2008
Last login: Jan 10, 2025
Total posts: 44,981 (3,037 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

How in the world can you claim that that is a good call?!!

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:31pm

There was early contact and there was a chance to break up the interference

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:32pm

Based on what gets called at times and what isn't called, that's a bad call..

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:33pm

There’s early contact. Defender didn’t play the ball. I

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:35pm

There is contact and then there is "contact" ... That was "contact" . I see it

Cougar TD

Jan 9, 8:40pm

I think it’s the fact that he hit him before the ball got there and interfered with his ability to catch the ball.

TwinsRight

Jan 9, 8:33pm

He had a good chance of at least breaking up the interception

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:34pm

No he didn’t. No way. Momentum going the other direction even without contact

Iman23

Jan 9, 8:44pm

You say that based off a slow motion replay, even if he didn’t have that chance,

cougaman

Jan 9, 8:52pm

It should be part of the rule. Reward a crappy throw. Under the rules you are

Iman23

Jan 9, 9:00pm

So you are saying that it was the right call, and being the right call they

cougaman

Jan 9, 9:02pm

It was the correct call. I don’t have a dog in this fight.

Samsonite

Jan 9, 8:34pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad