I still think it was a bad idea. RBs aren't worth that cost

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 5, 2025
9:32:20pm

Belboz Intervention Needed

I still think it was a bad idea. RBs aren't worth that cost

Report problem with this ad

Belboz

Bio page: Belboz
Joined: Jul 5, 2001
Last login: Jan 8, 2025
Total posts: 78,779 (14,136 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Remember when the Lions were highly criticized for reaching to draft a RB (Jahmyr Gibbs) at 12? Lol

RdF3 Inactive user

Jan 5, 9:25pm

He is freaking good. With that line, he is unreal.

NYCougz

Jan 5, 9:29pm

I still think it was a bad idea. RBs aren't worth that cost

Belboz

Jan 5, 9:32pm

That crazy. Gibbs does everything for them on offense.

RdF3

Jan 5, 9:33pm

And RBs will have success playing behind that offensive line

Belboz

Jan 5, 9:35pm

Drafting backs high works. It’s just not overpaying them after that first

NYCougz

Jan 5, 9:38pm

I’d rather draft someone that I want to give a second contract early in R1.

DieHarder

Jan 5, 9:39pm

I'd rather draft a guy in first round who plays in a more expensive position

Belboz

Jan 5, 9:40pm

It looks better than it did at the time, but I just hate that when you draft a

DieHarder

Jan 5, 9:38pm

If the Lions don’t win it all this year they’ll have a hard time getting back.

DKN

Jan 5, 9:43pm

They have a surplus of talent from their Goff/Stafford trade on rookie deals

Jan 5, 9:50pm

It’s like the Jordan Love pick. Bad process, good result anyway.

TCuz

Jan 5, 9:43pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad