Ohio State who is the biggest brand in the conference played everybody of consequence in that conference. Nobody is complaining about a 2 loss OSU because they played Oregon, Penn State and Indiana.

Indiana consequently had both teams that were in the national title game last season and Ohio State. Michigan was supposed to be good.

I hate this Indiana argument on CB for a few reasons. 1) Indiana's wins against Michigan, Nebraska and UW are every bit as impressive as anything Miami did. Miami was the first 2 loss team after IU amd 5 spots in front of BYU. Its a much bigger farce than IU. BYU is way down the list so if you start talking quality wins, Bama, South Carolina and Ole Miss are all still sitting in front of BYU if you re valuing wins over record 2) you have the committee putting a 1 loss Boise ahead of a 2 loss ASU with better wins and a 3 loss Clemson with better wins and ultimately far and away the most cupcake wins of any team in the tourney. Both of the seem like much bigger failures than IU as far as ranking or seeding