My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 21, 2024
1:46
:01
pm
BYUFootballisBack
Intervention Needed
If the SEC and BIG only had 3 two loss or better teams, then suddenly its a lot
easier for the committee to rank teams imo
The SEC having 6 two loss or better teams is wild
The BIG ending up with 4 one loss or better is also wild
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
BYUFootballisBack
Previous username
oddsewer
Bio page
BYUFootballisBack
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Last login
Nov 21, 2024
Total posts
16,348 (730 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
In the end, realignment is the true issue with this years CFP rankings. We had
BYUFootballisBack
1:38pm
If the SEC and BIG only had 3 two loss or better teams, then suddenly its a lot
BYUFootballisBack
1:46pm
SEC had 4 last year, BIG10 had 2, Big12 1, ACC 1, Pac12 2
BYUFootballisBack
1:46pm
Add in that the top 6 Big12 and ACC teams were all mid or bottom teams last year
BYUFootballisBack
1:53pm
This is never going to be right until the playoff looks like the NFL.
BlueFever
1:51pm
As long as the SEC and BIG are rewarded for how they schedule their conference
BYUFootballisBack
1:56pm
Well, winning the natty would certainly put a wrench in their schemes.
BlueFever
2:06pm
It is silly that 3 of 4 P4 conferences have 3 of 4 top contenders that don't
Doogal McCougar
4:45pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad