Nov 14, 2024
1:06:34pm
1:06:34pm
I think the problem here is we've seen the application on defense
not on offense. Stanford band and Utah students were UC. A coach tackling or tripping a player, refs have some latitude there. But I'm really unsure that the Harlan impeding a BYU defender has an application.
Sideline interference generally only applies when contact is made with a referee so not sure it would apply here either
I'm totally guessing here, but like a ref being able to award a TD if a coach ran out and tackled or tripped a runner, I'd guess the same thing would apply in reverse here if Harlan being on the field was deemed as interference
Sideline interference generally only applies when contact is made with a referee so not sure it would apply here either
I'm totally guessing here, but like a ref being able to award a TD if a coach ran out and tackled or tripped a runner, I'd guess the same thing would apply in reverse here if Harlan being on the field was deemed as interference
Originally posted on Nov 14, 2024 at 1:06:34pm
Message modified by stansburycoug on Nov 14, 2024 at 1:17:48pm
Message modified by stansburycoug on Nov 14, 2024 at 3:47:06pm
- Bio page
- stansburycoug
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Last login
- Nov 14, 2024
- Total posts
- 3,748 (5 FO)
Messages
Time
12:45pm
Well in that case his mere physical presence on the field affects that play. Even as just a distraction.
12:46pm
1:29pm
12:53pm
3:58pm
This doesn't seem to square with any other event in football. Here, the KR team is the offense, and the KO team is the
5:28pm