My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 27, 2024
8:28
:54
pm
BYU '80
Intervention Needed
I asked if he was hurt. At 34–18 the game wasn’t over
That was my question and my only point. Congrats on missing both
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
BYU '80
Bio page
BYU '80
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Last login
Oct 27, 2024
Total posts
53,525 (147 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
May have been discussed but did sitake discuss postgame why LJ didn’t play more
BYU '80
Oct 27, 6:49pm
LJ himself said he’s fine
canuckchuck
Oct 27, 6:51pm
Out for 68-74 weeks
NYCougz
Oct 27, 6:51pm
I figured it was more precautionary than anything
SUAVO
Oct 27, 6:51pm
Why would he play more? Why risk injury?
cougarfann888
Oct 27, 6:51pm
When byu was starting to struggle to get first downs and the lead was 34-18
BYU '80
Oct 27, 6:58pm
Ropati was doing really well and LJ is still coming back. Had 102 yards. No need
WP17
Oct 27, 6:53pm
Game was over. Precautionary. No injury and making sure they keep it that way for Holy War
JohnnyComeLately
Oct 27, 6:58pm
At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over
BYU '80
Oct 27, 6:59pm
It was.
Conan
Oct 27, 7:00pm
BYU had to execute multiple third downs. If they hadn’t the same guy who led
BYU '80
Oct 27, 7:24pm
A third and then they still would have needed a fourth
cougarfann888
Oct 27, 7:35pm
If byu had failed to get first downs and kicked a fg they would have had
BYU '80
Oct 27, 7:49pm
I will go with Kalani’s opinion over yours and the words of LJ himself.
JohnnyComeLately
Oct 27, 7:57pm
Unless you had Kalani on the phone during the time of the game it was 34-18
BYU '80
Oct 27, 8:06pm
Ok. So if the game had played out differently than it did, I suspect we would have seen LJ.
Spiff
Oct 27, 8:05pm
Considering LJ was about the only known starter not in the game at 34-18
BYU '80
Oct 27, 8:06pm
Fine. It's a valid question. You've been given several valid answers. It's on you if you don't like them.
Spiff
Oct 27, 8:08pm
Which answers were valid. We never got an answer. Every response here has been
BYU '80
Oct 27, 8:19pm
I guess you're right then. He was hurt and BYU almost lost.
Spiff
Oct 27, 8:24pm
I asked if he was hurt. At 34–18 the game wasn’t over
BYU '80
Oct 27, 8:28pm
Maybe read my post one more time. What does precautionary mean to you?
JohnnyComeLately
Oct 27, 8:31pm
I saw what you said. That was an opinion but never confirmed.
BYU '80
Oct 27, 8:39pm
And he told Wrubell he was healthy. So not sure what point you are trying to make.
JohnnyComeLately
Oct 27, 8:49pm
If the game was won, why only take him out? It’s a pretty clear point
BYU '80
Oct 27, 10:31pm
RE: At 34-18 with ten minutes left it wasn’t over
JohnnyComeLately
Oct 27, 7:05pm
For those laughing, Greg and Hans were asking the same question on the radio
BYU '80
Oct 27, 6:59pm
The question has been asked many times but you may not have seen
NYCougz
Oct 27, 7:29pm
I hadn’t seen which is the reason I asked as stated in the original post
BYU '80
Oct 27, 7:50pm
If he is hurt, sadly sitake won’t be clear about it
NYCougz
Oct 27, 8:39pm
LJ in post game said it was a charlie horse.
Lance71
Oct 27, 7:00pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad